NOTICE FROM THE FOUNDATION RECORDS AND INFORMATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
財団記録・情報保安管理局より通達
NOTICE OF SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY
The following document has been abridged, editorialized, and summarized for brevity and to strictly necessitate Foundation-approved data and information only.
論文概要の通達
以下の文書は簡潔化、及び財団により厳密に承認されたデータ及び情報のみを必要とするために、単純化・個人的見解の挿入・要約がなされています。
This summarization has been authored by:
— Raz Itomori, Department of Scientific Dissemination, RAISA
On authority of the Overseer Council, 2020
この概要は以下の人物により執筆されました。
— ラズ・イトモリ、科学啓蒙部門、RAISA
監督評議会認可済、2020
Submitted for certification & completion of DFA1 Program, C. 2017
DFA2課程の認定と修了に際し提出、 2017頃
Mari V. Schmidt[1], et al.
これまでに分かっていること: 何が、どのように、何故という問いに答える。;グリーン-タイプ — 創発的生物形態学の研究と分析における現代概論
マリ・V・シュミット[1]、他。
History & Forward
The Foundation has long sought to identify the intrinsic link between emergent bio-physical phenomenology and emergent anomalous phenomenology. Attempts at understanding have led to various, at times inconsistent, hypothesis and interpretations; see: formally, Excerpts from PHYSICS Division Field Manual 13 3, informally, An FAQ; Or, What the Hell is a Hume? 4. As most containment procedures function quite effectively with cursory, if not minimal, knowledge of both Reality Benders, Green-Types5, and the Reality Anchors6 meant to negate their anomalous effects on the Hume/Reality around them, little has been done in the way of expanding the Foundation’s current compendium on both phenomena.
沿革と見込
財団は長い間、創発的生物物理現象学と異常現象学の間にある本質的な因果関係を特定しようとしてきた。理解の試みは様々な、時には一貫性のない仮説や解釈をもたらしてきた。参照: 公式、PHYSICS部門フィールドマニュアル13:特殊事態:人型脅威存在 7、非公式、FAQ;~ヒュームって一体全体なんだ? 8。現実改変者、すなわちグリーン・タイプ9及びそれらが引き起こす周辺のヒューム/現実性に対する異常影響を無効化することを目的に作られている現実錨10に関する大雑把な、あるいは最低限の知識を有していれば、ほとんどの収容プロトコルは非常に有効に機能するために、両方の現象に対して現在財団が用いている概論はほとんど拡張されてこなかった。
Abstract
This paper seeks to adequately address and determine the modes of operation at fundamental levels, where emergent phenomena can be effectively merged with modern & interdisciplinary models within well established & theoretical frameworks.
要約
当論文は、十分に実証された理論的枠組みの中で、創発的現象を現代的かつ学際的なモデルと有効的に統合できる、基本的な段階における演算様式を適切に取り扱い、決定することを目指す。
What
Introduction
何が
前書き
With the discovery & confirmation of the Higgs Boson as well as its ancillary scalar field in 2012[3], scientists within the Foundation began to ruminate over the implications of additional scalar/gauge fields inside of their theoretical modeling. Although seminal at the time, the works of Clef, Caldmann & Rzewski were already nearing the conclusions of their limited research, and thusly neglected to entertain the idea of “Hume” measurement to a possible “virtual” or “gauge” particle of a scalar field. Explicitly, the back and forth when Caldmann is asked, responds, and later reneges:
ヒッグス粒子とそれに付随するスカラー場の発見と確証に伴い、財団内の科学者たちはその理論モデルの中にスカラー/ゲージ場が追加されることの意味を考証し始めた。当時は画期的であったクレフとコウルドマン及びジェフスキーの研究は、既にその限られた研究の終わりに近づいており、このために「ヒューム」測定の概念について「仮想」粒子または「ゲージ」粒子の可能性を考慮することを怠った。このことはコウルドマンが質問され、答え、その後回答を否定するまでのやり取りからも明白である。
ヒュームは物質によって構成されているのか?もしそうならばそれらは質量を持っているのか?ヒュームはどのような物質の状態なのか?
-Ws博士
A: 私達が知る限り個々のヒュームは無質量であり、無限に集まっています。
この記述は正確ではありません、ヒュームは粒子ではないのです。下記参照。
待ってくれ、私はヒュームとはどのくらい現実性が安定しているか測定するものだと思っていた(温度のような)が現在それらは粒子だと言っているのか?
-Sh博士
おっしゃる通りです。ヒュームは現実性の尺度であり、粒子ではありません。過去の回答は誤りでした。上記参照。
It is quite evident that the thought process seen here was most certainly steering the responding research team in the direction of a QFT11 interpretation of the Hume measurement. Unfortunately, whether it be by lack of effort and energy, or sheer lack of interdisciplinary study, Caldmann & Rzewski neglected to consider whether the measurement of Hume could be seen through the lens of a conformal field theory.
ここで見られるような思考プロセスを通して、回答した研究チームが間違いなくヒューム測定のQFT12解釈を行っていたことは火を見るよりも明らかである。
遺憾ながら、それが努力や取り組みの不足であろうと、まったくの学際的研究の不足であろうと、コウルドマン及びジェフスキーはヒューム測定を共形場理論の視点から解釈できる可能性について検討することを怠ってしまった。
As “temperature” is ultimately the amount of excitation of energies (ie matter) within a given system, so is “Hume” the measurement of the excitation of reality within a given system (ie the universe). This functionality and interpretation has given way to a broader understanding of Hume as a scalar field, with Dr. Jay Wentworth notably stating in Quantum Hume Theory, An Ontokinetic Look Behind Reality, “It would seem that the maths points to the energies needed to produce a force-carrier, boson-like, particle from a symmetry-breaking excitation of the proposed ‘Hume Field’ would be near infinite, or resultant of negative, true-vacuum energies.”[4] It can then be reasoned that the line of thinking proposed in Caldmann & Rzewski’s retracted answer was truly more in-line with how we currently understand Hume and its now established Hume Field.
「温度」とは突き詰めていくと与えられた系におけるエネルギー(すなわち物質)の励起量であるように、「ヒューム」もまた同様に与えられた系(すなわち宇宙)における現実性の励起測定である。ジェイ・ウェントワースが『量子ヒューム理論、現実性の背後にあるオントキネテックの考察』にて特に「提唱されている『ヒューム場』における対称性を破る励起から、ボソンのような力を媒介する粒子を生成するのに必要とされるエネルギーは、無限大に近いか真の真空のエネルギーの負の総計に近い可能性がある」と述べているように、この機能と解釈によりヒュームをスカラー場としてより広範に理解する事ができるようになった。[4] ならば、コウルドマン及びジェフスキーの撤回した回答における考え方の方が、ヒュームと現在では立証されているヒューム場を我々がどう理解しているか今理解と合っていたと結論付けられる。
Quantum-Electroweak Analogies of The Hume Field
With Hume adequately described as a scalar field permeating spacetime, this definition gives us the insight into what comprises the ontokinetic relationship of Hume energies at the quantum scale and later, extending in extrapolation through the AdS/CFT13[5] boundary up to the molecular/cellular level.
At its core, the Hume Field can be reasonably defined as the causal output of a 12-Dimensional construct using a Calabi–Yau diametric manifold, in which the tensor-vector of the manifold is defined along a n-symmetry value, that value, always of course being of an implicit, non-zero-absolute as defined by the Ricci curvature.[6]
These 12-D constructs are found between the scalar intersection of 11-D space & 1-D time (causally in both directions) of macro-scale 4-D Minkowski Space-Time, a la Kluza-Klein transformations, as essential “nodal-vectors”, wherein these symmetries are vibrating at lengths 1 x 10-33.[7]
Thusly, not only do we find that the maths modeling our previous understanding of Hume reflects a stark similarity to 12-D/M-Theory, but that the measurement of “Hume” in a definable space is almost completely analogous to the way in which we currently understand the emergent properties of reality from within M-Theory. This can be most exceedingly clear when comparing the way in which we use M-Theory to define the electroweak force’s effect on macro-scale processes, and Hume Field Theory to define baseline reality at the AdS/CTF boundary.
At these boundaries, where near-infinite permutations of quantum-scopic nodal-vectors are aggregated to macro-scale phenomenon, we find that like gravity at the AdS/CTF boundary, Hume behaves very similarly. Where “space-time tells matter how to move; matter tells space-time how to curve”14, so does “Hume tells reality how to manifest; reality tells Hume how to fluctuate”. To be of note is the understanding surrounding the interplay of macroscopic phenomena arising from quantum scale field properties, puts the Foundation in a unique position to argue for solutions to a Unified Field Theory, a “Theory of Everything” as defined by modern and classical mechanics, not to mention the potential pataphysical implications, the both of which are currently completely beyond the research team’s goals and understanding, and are not the aims of this paper.
What is put forth, is that evident data from the equations surrounding emergent phenomena in the Hume Field, points to the fact that the vibrations of bundled Hume nodes are the cause of manifested reality. Should deviations in these fluctuations occur, their interactions with the macro-world are most certainly present and observed. In the same way the electroweak interactions at subatomic levels give rise to emergent phenomena within cellular activity, see: bio-electrostatic properties; Hume interactions at microscopic levels can and do affect biochemical processes.
How
”The Powerhouse of the Cell”
What can be determined from the limited sample size of bio-analysis in the Green-Types currently in Foundation custody, is the extreme proliferation of large-scale A-typical mitochondrial cultures within all active heterogeneous cells of examined individuals. Whereas most typical mitochondrial cultures per-cell average 100k-500k active sites, Green-Type cellular biology has shown ranges of 800k-1.2m active sites per-cell.[8] These additional, A-typical mitochondria in particular, when put under Hume reading equipment display consistent and determinable deviation from baseline Hume levels, often exhibiting extreme bio-kinetic properties[2].
The most notable examples of these bio-humetric manipulations are those found and resultant of neuronal-mitochondria. The mitochondria in non-anomalous individuals typically number in range of 100,000-1 million active sites per cell, in proportion to axion length and synapse size. However, when looking at Green-Type individuals, the findings are no less than astonishing. In measured subjects, the active sites number from 250k to an observed maximum of 5.8 million, each one of these A-typical mitochondria displaying aberrant effects on the measured Hume Field. These effects, as evidenced in the maths concerning the crossing of the AdS/CFT boundary, are aggregative and logarithmic. Conclusions can be drawn to determine that the power a Green-Type individual has on the Hume Field is directly proportional and logarithmically scaled to the amount of A-typical mitochondria within said individual.
Control of Hume as a Biomechanism
With a clear understanding of “What” the mechanisms for manipulations of the Hume Field entail, a better detail on “How” is needed to complete the bigger picture, before answering “Why”.
From limited bio-analysis given to the research team by the Foundation, the modes of operational biomechanics within A-typical neuronal-mitochondria function largely similar and analogous to non-anomalous active sites. Typical hormone response, transport chain processes, cytoplasmic enzyme production, and other cellular activity are largely unaffected by the presence and anomalous effects of, and in some cases are both accelerated and assisted by, A-typical mitochondria.[9]
Notable examples of this include the anomalous use of Hume manipulation to accelerate wound healing, transmutate cellular areas into blast, bullet, or heat-resistant materials, using analogous humectrophoresis to redirect hydrostatic flows, and vibrate materials at natural resonant frequencies resulting in material dissolutions.
At larger scales, with larger energy potentials contained within individuals with larger A-typical mitochondria cultures, the practice15, use, and manipulation of the Hume Field can produce wildly anomalous behavior. Fluctuations in macro-scale Hume vectors, most notably those intrinsically linked to the QHF, and thusly a direct interference and manipulation of baseline Hume can produce effects in the range of, but certainly not limited to:
- Spontaneous Matter Generation
- Time Dilation/Contraction
- Universal Constant Reconfiguration
- Tangental/Auxiliary M-Brane Universal Collision, Collapse, Creation16
These baseline effects, most commonly referred to as “ontokinesis”, or “essokinesis” in past research, are at the crux of what the Foundation hopes to discover and understand in the pursuit of maintaining normalcy. Emergent ontokinetic biomorphisms can now be generally seen as abnormalities within mitochondrial cultures, and as with all mitochondrial research, it is to be overwhelmingly stated, that mtDNA is easily traced through materlineal studies.[10]
Biomorphisms and Genetic Tracing
The start of the modern mtDNA halpogroup in humans (Homosapien sapiens) can be genealogically traced back through female inheritance to about ±200-250 kya. However, the relative, direct and still consistent relationship between modern humans and this “Mitochondrial Eve” suggests that the modern human mitochondrial genome may go further back to Antediluvian epochs of ±400-800 kya and in relation to hypothesized Homo aeturnus. Thusly, the Green-type/ontokinetic phenomena is also present and consistent through these lineages.
Further extrapolation of mtDNA tracing reveals that the Hume Field manipulation mechanism outlined as the ontokinetic phenomenon is present not only in human subjects, but in all examples of reality-bending earth-based, carbonic life-domains that perform biochemical metabolic processes for the purposes of survival and reproductive propagation. [11]
Why
Conclusion
It would be unfortunately evident that there may be no clear genesis for emergent ontokinetic properties, reality bending capabilities, and the Green-Type phenomena. Though that conclusion, at face value seems to disappoint, we at the research team, deem this discovery a success. We have now in our understanding a near complete picture of how emergent reality works and the Green-Type effect on it, along with a history and lineage as old as life itself. It may be said that in failing to explain why Green-Types exist, we come to a better conclusion of why anything exists in the first place. The two, anomalous and non-anomalous, are not mutually exclusive, with a past that converges on one point. Where the two meet is at the nexus where reality, the universe, and life begin.
付与予定タグ: クレフ博士 en tale
ページコンソール
批評ステータス
カテゴリ
SCP-JP本投稿の際にscpタグを付与するJPでのオリジナル作品の下書きが該当します。
本投稿の際にgoi-formatタグを付与するJPでのオリジナル作品の下書きが該当します。
本投稿の際にtaleタグを付与するJPでのオリジナル作品の下書きが該当します。
翻訳作品の下書きが該当します。
他のカテゴリタグのいずれにも当て嵌まらない下書きが該当します。
言語
EnglishРусский한국어中文FrançaisPolskiEspañolภาษาไทยDeutschItalianoУкраїнськаPortuguêsČesky繁體中文Việtその他日→外国語翻訳日本支部の記事を他言語版サイトに翻訳投稿する場合の下書きが該当します。
コンテンツマーカー
ジョーク本投稿の際にジョークタグを付与する下書きが該当します。
本投稿の際にアダルトタグを付与する下書きが該当します。
本投稿済みの下書きが該当します。
イベント参加予定の下書きが該当します。
フィーチャー
短編構文を除き数千字以下の短編・掌編の下書きが該当します。
短編にも長編にも満たない中編の下書きが該当します。
構文を除き数万字以上の長編の下書きが該当します。
特定の事前知識を求めない下書きが該当します。
SCPやGoIFなどのフォーマットが一定の記事種でフォーマットを崩している下書きが該当します。
シリーズ-JP所属
JPのカノンや連作に所属しているか、JPの特定記事の続編の下書きが該当します。
JPではないカノンや連作に所属しているか、JPではない特定記事の続編の下書きが該当します。
JPのGoIやLoIなどの世界観用語が登場する下書きが該当します。
JPではないGoIやLoIなどの世界観用語が登場する下書きが該当します。
ジャンル
アクションSFオカルト/都市伝説感動系ギャグ/コミカルシリアスシュールダーク人間ドラマ/恋愛ホラー/サスペンスメタフィクション歴史任意
任意A任意B任意C- portal:7664517 (04 Oct 2021 14:49)
コメント投稿フォームへ
注意: 批評して欲しいポイントやスポイラー、改稿内容についてはコメントではなく下書き本文に直接書き入れて下さい。初めての下書きであっても投稿報告は不要です。批評内容に対する返答以外で自身の下書きにコメントしないようお願いします。
批評コメントTopへ